Verbal Disagreement In Philosophy Example

Who is right and who is wrong? In a way, both teachers are right because they seem to be working with two different definitions of „best students.“ For Teacher A, the best student is the one with the highest average grade. For Teacher B, the best student is someone who has the highest number of A grades. Obviously, the student who meets the first definition does not need to be the same as the student who meets the second definition. This is an example of what we might call a purely verbal quarrel, where the apparent disagreement is not due to differences of opinion on the facts, but to the different understanding of the meaning of a key concept or concept. Our semi-annual journal is published by the Department of Philosophy at the University of Arkansas. Philosophical Topics publishes contributions to all areas of philosophy, with each edition devoted to problems in a field. Recently, there has been talk of individuality, introspection and free will. There are two main ways to resolve a purely verbal quarrel as soon as the different meanings of a key concept are highlighted. First, the various parties could agree not to agree on the use of the term. Thus, Teachers A and B could agree that they have provided two different definitions of „the best student“, and that they are both legitimate, and they can agree that Cindy is the best student under one interpretation and that Betty is the best student under a different interpretation. Can you give your own examples of factual and verbal quarrels? Verbal conflicts are often contrasted with factual conflicts, where differences of opinion are related to differing opinions about facts and not importance.

Kategorien
  • Keine Kategorien