Diplomatic Agreement Define

Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary The head of a diplomatic mission; the highest official diplomatic representative of his country in the country to which he is accredited and the personal representative of his own head of State to the head of State of the host country. The term „exceptional“ doesn`t really mean anything. Years ago, it was only awarded to non-resident ambassadors in temporary missions and was used to distinguish them from regular local ambassadors. The latter were angry with others who had this name, because it seemed to imply a lesser position for themselves. After all, they were also conceded. „Plenipotentiary“ also descends over the years. Today, it is simply possessing all the power to make an ambassador a normal job. The ambassador is highlighted when it relates to a particular person (e.g.B Ambassador Smith). Sent Nowadays, reference was made to any high-ranking diplomat. In the past, it had a specific hierarchical connotation that was used to designate diplomatic agents of less than the highest rank.

At present, diplomatic practice must deal with both differences in relations between States and the changing structure of transnational relations. It is not possible to say whether or when a problem can be solved „objectively“ by a formulated solution. In addition, each scenario is different and must be treated carefully by different approaches. The increasing complexity of diplomatic agreements, which cover many areas beyond traditional conflicts, requires tailor-made solutions. In international matters, Accreditation is the agreement of a State to receive members of a diplomatic representation of a foreign country. Relations with the Ottoman Empire were particularly important for the Italian states, which knew the Ottoman government as a sublime gate. [6] The republics of Genoa and Venice depended ever less on their nautical capabilities and ever more on maintaining good relations with the Ottomans. [6] The interactions between different traders, diplomats and ecclesiastics of the Italian and Ottoman empires contributed to the opening and creation of new forms of diplomacy and state art. Finally, the main objective of a diplomat, who was originally a negotiator, became a persona that represented an autonomous state in all aspects of political affairs. It became clear that all other rulers felt the need to adapt diplomatically due to the birth of the powerful political environment of the Ottoman Empire.

[6] One could conclude that in early modern times, the atmosphere of diplomacy revolved around a basis of conformity with Ottoman culture. In 1994, Arthur M. Schlesinger stated that „diplomacy is useful if the rules of the game are generally the same. However, the ideological wars of the twentieth century shook the context of common values“ (Schlesinger, 1994, 150). .

Kategorien
  • Keine Kategorien